Banking & Payments

Mercury vs Relay vs Novo for Foreign-Owned LLCs (2025-2026)

11 min readArticle

Key Takeaways

  • Mercury, Relay, and Novo are not interchangeable for foreign founders.
  • Eligibility and KYC friction often matter more than feature lists.
  • Mercury tends to be the most foreign-founder-friendly of the three.
  • Choose based on the documents and workflow your business can realistically support.

These providers solve different banking problems

Foreign founders often compare Mercury, Relay, and Novo as if they were interchangeable checking accounts. They are not. Mercury is usually the most explicitly foreign-founder-facing of the three and talks openly about supporting U.S. companies founded around the world, subject to onboarding and country restrictions. Relay is strongest when the business wants operational cash-management workflows, multiple accounts, and team-based controls. Novo feels lighter and simpler, but its onboarding and address expectations are often a better fit for more domestically grounded businesses.

That means the right question is not which one is best in general. It is which one matches the founder's residency, documentation, payment flow, and operational style.

Eligibility friction is often more important than feature marketing

Mercury highlights EIN, formation documents, beneficial-owner identity documents, and a real principal business address that is not just a registered-agent address. Relay's help materials are also explicit that address verification and identity review are part of account approval, and its product has become more tiered around cash-management workflows. Novo's guidance is more limiting for many foreign founders because it expects a U.S. business address and, in some cases, SSN or ITIN-style owner information in onboarding.

So the best bank on paper is useless if the business cannot pass the platform's actual KYC process cleanly.

Pick the bank that matches your workflow, not your wishlist

A one-owner Delaware or Wyoming LLC with international founders and a need for startup-style onboarding often starts with Mercury. A team with multiple spend buckets, bookkeeper involvement, and frequent wires may prefer Relay. A more domestic founder profile that wants a lighter checking setup may still find Novo workable.

The editorial answer is simple: do not choose based on branding alone. Choose based on whether the account can be opened, maintained, and defended with the documents you actually have.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which provider is usually easiest for a non-U.S. founder with a U.S. LLC?

Often Mercury, because it openly supports many U.S. companies founded by people living outside the United States, subject to restrictions and approval.

Is Relay better than Mercury for cash management?

It can be. Relay is often more attractive for businesses that want multiple operating accounts, approvals, and bookkeeping-friendly cash segmentation.

Can Novo be harder for foreign founders?

Yes, depending on the founder's residency, address setup, and owner identification profile. Its onboarding can fit more domestic business situations more naturally.

bankingbank accountwire transferpayments

Never miss an IRS deadline

Get free email reminders for Form 5472, state annual reports, quarterly estimated tax, and OBBBA rule changes — built for foreign-owned LLC owners. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

We respect your privacy. No spam, ever.

More on Banking & Payments